O'Connor v. Schleck
This text of 206 N.W.2d 554 (O'Connor v. Schleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari was granted to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission (1) awarding death benefits upon findings by a majority of the commission (which reversed contrary findings by a compensation judge) that the employee’s heart attack and resulting death were work-related, and (2) denying employer-insurer’s petitions to reopen to take additional evidence.
Applying oft-repeated rules governing our scope of review of factual findings based upon conflicting testimony of both lay and expert witnesses, we are satisfied that there is ample evidence to support the commission’s finding of causal relationship between decedent’s work activities, his heart attack, and his resulting death. See, Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Co. 283 Minn. 205, 167 N. W. 2d 14 (1969); Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 282 Minn. 322, 164 N. W. 2d 873 (1969). There is also ample justification to sustain the commission’s discretionary refusal to reopen the proceeding upon a determination that the additional evidence sought to be submitted by the employer-insurer on rehearing was neither “new” or “significant” nor unavailable at the time of the hearing on the merits.
Respondent is allowed attorney’s fees, payable to her attorney, in the amount of $400.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 N.W.2d 554, 296 Minn. 484, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-schleck-minn-1973.