O'Connor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre

231 A.D.2d 700, 648 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9720
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 700 (O'Connor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, 231 A.D.2d 700, 648 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated October 23, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion to transfer the action from Bronx County to Nassau County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured while working in Nassau County in September 1993. He commenced this action in December 1994, placing venue in Bronx County on the basis of his alleged residence. Along with' its answer, the defendant served a demand to change venue but failed to move within 15 days thereof to change venue to Nassau County (see, CPLR 511). During discovery, Workers’ Compensation documents were produced indicating that the plaintiff resided in Bronx County from October 1993 to June 1994, but that in July 1994 he changed his address to Suffern, Rockland County.

In July 1995, the defendant moved to transfer the action from Bronx County to Nassau County on the ground that the plaintiff did not reside in Bronx County on the date of the commencement of the action and on the ground that the material witnesses would be inconvenienced by a trial in Bronx County. The Supreme Court granted this motion.

The plaintiff resided in Rockland County at the time the action was commenced (see, CPLR 503 [a]). Moreover, we find that the defendant promptly moved to change venue after ascertaining the plaintiff’s true residence (see, CPLR 511; Roman v Brereton, 182 AD2d 556, 557; Philogene v Fuller Auto Leasing, 167 AD2d 178, 179). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Accardi v. Kaufmann
82 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Supino v. PV Holding Corp.
291 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Vallianos v. Mobile/ Modular Express, Incorporated
274 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
McBride v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center
271 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Runcie v. Cross County Shopping Mall
268 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Buziashvili v. Ryan
264 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D.2d 700, 648 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-roman-catholic-diocese-of-rockville-centre-nyappdiv-1996.