O'Connor v. O'Connor

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Connor v. O'Connor

849 S.W.2d 233, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 243, 1993 WL 43660

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 1993·No. No. 62299·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A dissolution decree incorporated the parties’ separation agreement. Subsequently, Wife filed a motion to determine and a motion for contempt. The trial court denied those motions. Wife appeals. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The order of the trial court is supported by substantial and competent evidence and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been fur[234]*234nished with a memorandum for their information, only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A dissolution decree incorporated the parties’ separation agreement. Subsequently, Wife filed a motion to determine and a motion for contempt. The trial court denied those motions. Wife appeals. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The order of the trial court is supported by substantial and competent evidence and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been fur[234]*234nished with a memorandum for their information, only.

O'Connor v. O'Connor, 849 S.W.2d 233, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 243, 1993 WL 43660 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

849 S.W.2d 233 (O'Connor v. O'Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.