O'Connor v. New York Central Railroad

254 A.D. 930, 6 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339

This text of 254 A.D. 930 (O'Connor v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connor v. New York Central Railroad, 254 A.D. 930, 6 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law on the ground that the finding that there was any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant is contrary to the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for property damage to an automobile and damages for loss of services of and medical attendance for plaintiff’s wife resulting from an automobile collision caused by smoke from burning ties.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 930, 6 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1938.