O'Connor v. Nelson
395 S.W.3d 76, 2013 WL 1305507, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 401
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Nelson appeals and Ms. O’Connor cross-appeals the amended judgment of the trial court, which found that there was an implied easement over a circular driveway that runs across both Mr. Nelson’s property and Ms. O’Connor’s and that Ms. O’Connor abandoned her claim under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Connor v. Nelson, 395 S.W.3d 76, 2013 WL 1305507, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
395 S.W.3d 76 (O'Connor v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.