O'Connor v. Narragansett Machine Co.
This text of 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 48 (O'Connor v. Narragansett Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RESCRIPT
This is a Workmen’s 'Compensation case heard upon petition of the workman that payments for injury to his hand be continued. Payments were stopped on December 26th-last.
We think the weight of medieal testimony is decidedly in favor of the respondent and to the effect that sufficient union of the fractured finger had taken place to enable the petitioner to work at the time when payments were stopped. We are particularly impressed by the evidence that if union had not taken place at that time a neorosis of the finger would have occurred.
Petiton denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-narragansett-machine-co-risuperct-1919.