O'Connor v. Moschowitz
48 How. Pr. 451
This text of 48 How. Pr. 451 (O'Connor v. Moschowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Connor v. Moschowitz, 48 How. Pr. 451 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1875).
Opinion
The Court unanimously reversed the judgment, the chief judge stating that the sureties being sufficient in law, as shown by their sworn examinations, the justice was bound judicially to approve the undertaking and sign the order of removal. A judge should have no private reason—it must be a judicial reason and not an arbitrary, whimsical, capricious reason.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People ex rel. Goldstein v. Bolte
71 N.Y.S. 73 (New York Supreme Court, 1900)
People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. Roesch
27 Misc. 44 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
Greve v. Wallowitz
24 Misc. 601 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Monagan v. Lehigh Val. R. Co.
35 N.Y.S. 135 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Warren v. Campbell
14 N.Y.S. 165 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 How. Pr. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-moschowitz-nyctcompl-1875.