O'Connor v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

O'Connor v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

80 A. 1133, 107 Me. 522, 1910 Me. LEXIS 137

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 28, 1910·Published

Opinion

(No record received by the reporter.) Apparently an action on the case to recover damages for injuries sustained and caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant, a nonsuit ordered, and exceptions taken. The rescript says : "Though the plaintiff’s mother testified that she saw the street car collide with the plaintiff the undisputed situation and events clearly show that she was mistaken, and that there was no collision. The evidence fails to show that the defendant company caused the plaintiff’s injury. The nonsuit was properly ordered.” Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(No record received by the reporter.) Apparently an action on the case to recover damages for injuries sustained and caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant, a nonsuit ordered, and exceptions taken. The rescript says : "Though the plaintiff’s mother testified that she saw the street car collide with the plaintiff the undisputed situation and events clearly show that she was mistaken, and that there was no collision. The evidence fails to show that the defendant company caused the plaintiff’s injury. The nonsuit was properly ordered.” Exceptions overruled.

O'Connor v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway, 80 A. 1133, 107 Me. 522, 1910 Me. LEXIS 137 (Me. 1910).

Pincite

80 A. 1133 (O'Connor v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.