O'Connor v. Levine

167 A.D. 919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Connor v. Levine. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 A.D. 919

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff having knowledge of the contract which he claims was made with the defendant, he is not entitled to examine the defendant before trial for the purpose of framing a complaint. The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. Levine, 167 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

167 A.D. 919 (O'Connor v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.