O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line
68 N.E.2d 450, 296 N.Y. 501, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1125
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding that plaintiff’s efforts were the procuring cause of the. requisitioning of defendant’s vessel. We decide no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thachbr and Furo, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line, 68 N.E.2d 450, 296 N.Y. 501, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1125 (N.Y. 1946).
68 N.E.2d 450 (O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal Pacific Electric Co. v. McAdams
207 Misc. 525 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1955)
Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.
194 Misc. 81 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)