O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line
68 N.E.2d 450, 296 N.Y. 501, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1125
This text of 68 N.E.2d 450 (O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Connor v. Hudson River Day Line, 68 N.E.2d 450, 296 N.Y. 501, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1125 (N.Y. 1946).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding that plaintiff’s efforts were the procuring cause of the. requisitioning of defendant’s vessel. We decide no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thachbr and Furo, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Federal Pacific Electric Co. v. McAdams
207 Misc. 525 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1955)
Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.
194 Misc. 81 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 N.E.2d 450, 296 N.Y. 501, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-hudson-river-day-line-ny-1946.