O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.

496 P.2d 141, 17 Ariz. App. 151, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 645
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided May 2, 1972·No. No. 1 CA-CIV 1594·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an employee of appellee, allegedly suffered an industrial injury while so employed, and he filed a workmen’s ■compensation claim. Becoming dissatisfied with the workmen’s compensation proceedings, he filed this lawsuit in the superior court, alleging that appellee Breached a contractual duty to abide by workmen’s compensation laws and rules, seeking $100,000 in general damages.

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon' which relief could be granted. The court granted the motion, hence this appeal. On the basis of Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise, 13 Ariz.App. 522, 478 P.2d 137 (1970), we affirm.

NOTE: This cause was decided by the Judges of Division Two as authorized by A.R.S. § 12-120, subsec. E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co., 496 P.2d 141, 17 Ariz. App. 151, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 645 (Ark. Ct. App. 1972).

496 P.2d 141 (O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
718 P.2d 193 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
571 P.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)