O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.

496 P.2d 141, 17 Ariz. App. 151, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 645

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona

DecidedMay 2, 1972

DocketNo. 1 CA-CIV 1594

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 496 P.2d 141 (O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Connor v. Howard P. Foley Co., 496 P.2d 141, 17 Ariz. App. 151, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 645 (Ark. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an employee of appellee, allegedly suffered an industrial injury while so employed, and he filed a workmen’s ■compensation claim. Becoming dissatisfied with the workmen’s compensation proceedings, he filed this lawsuit in the superior court, alleging that appellee Breached a contractual duty to abide by workmen’s compensation laws and rules, seeking $100,000 in general damages.

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon' which relief could be granted. The court granted the motion, hence this appeal. On the basis of Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise, 13 Ariz.App. 522, 478 P.2d 137 (1970), we affirm.

NOTE: This cause was decided by the Judges of Division Two as authorized by A.R.S. § 12-120, subsec. E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an employee of appellee, allegedly suffered an industrial injury while so employed, and he filed a workmen’s ■compensation claim. Becoming dissatisfied with the workmen’s compensation proceedings, he filed this lawsuit in the superior court, alleging that appellee Breached a contractual duty to abide by workmen’s compensation laws and rules, seeking $100,000 in general damages.

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon' which relief could be granted. The court granted the motion, hence this appeal. On the basis of Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise, 13 Ariz.App. 522, 478 P.2d 137 (1970), we affirm.

NOTE: This cause was decided by the Judges of Division Two as authorized by A.R.S. § 12-120, subsec. E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 P.2d 141, 17 Ariz. App. 151, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-howard-p-foley-co-arizctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack