O'Connor v. Hermannhof Winery, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Connor v. Hermannhof Winery, Inc.

235 S.W.3d 596, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410, 2007 WL 2993673

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. No. ED 89316·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn O’Connor appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hermannhof Winery, Inc. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dawn O’Connor appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hermannhof Winery, Inc. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

O'Connor v. Hermannhof Winery, Inc., 235 S.W.3d 596, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410, 2007 WL 2993673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

235 S.W.3d 596 (O'Connor v. Hermannhof Winery, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.