O'Connor v. Hammond

California Supreme Court

O'Connor v. Hammond

1 Cal. Unrep. 11

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 1856

DocketNo. 779

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 11 (O'Connor v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Connor v. Hammond, 1 Cal. Unrep. 11 (Cal. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

TERRY, J.

— This cause was tried below by a jury, and the evidence fully sustains the judgment and there is no error on the record.

The witness Barney, who testified on behalf of plaintiff, was incompetent, on account of interest, ánd would no doubt have been excluded if the objection had. been taken on the trial. This was not done, and the point cannot be raised here for the first time.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

I concur: Heydenfeldt, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TERRY, J.

— This cause was tried below by a jury, and the evidence fully sustains the judgment and there is no error on the record.

The witness Barney, who testified on behalf of plaintiff, was incompetent, on account of interest, ánd would no doubt have been excluded if the objection had. been taken on the trial. This was not done, and the point cannot be raised here for the first time.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

I concur: Heydenfeldt, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-hammond-cal-1856.