O'Connor v. Florida Blood Services, Inc.
This text of 725 So. 2d 382 (O'Connor v. Florida Blood Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tina M. O’Connor appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that Ms. O’Connor is not entitled to benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed the appeals referee’s decision. On appeal to this court, the commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Kelle v. D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd., 658 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We find no legal error. Ms. O’Connor failed to provide a transcript of the hearing; and competent, substantial evidence in the record supports the finding of disqualification for unemployment compensation benefits. Therefore, we affirm the determination that Ms. O’Connor is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See Smalls v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 485 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
725 So. 2d 382, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14851, 1999 WL 2610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-florida-blood-services-inc-fladistctapp-1998.