O'Connor v. Fitch
46 N.Y.S. 1097
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1897
StatusPublished
This text of 46 N.Y.S. 1097 (O'Connor v. Fitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Connor v. Fitch, 46 N.Y.S. 1097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).
Opinion
Action by Thomas H. O’Connor against Ashvel P. Fitch and others. T. Connoly, for appellants. E. Root, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Beekman v. Railroad Co., 43 N. Y. Supp. 174.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beekman v. Third Avenue Railroad
13 A.D. 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 N.Y.S. 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-fitch-nyappdiv-1897.