O'Connor v. Doll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

O'Connor v. Doll

93 N.W. 1134, 88 Minn. 455, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 430

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 13, 1903·No. Nos. 13,128-(31); Nos. 13,129-(32); Nos. 13,130-(33.); Nos. 13,131-(34); Nos. 13,132-(35); Nos. 13,133-(36); Nos. 13,134-(37); Nos. 13,135-(38); Nos. 13,136-(39); Nos. 13,137-(40); Nos. 13,138-(41); Nos. 13,139-(42); Nos. 13,140-(43); Nos. 13,174-(44); Nos. 13,350-(267); No. 13,409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In each of the foregoing cases there was an appeal from the judgment of the district court of the county of Traverse, and each case was submitted to this court upon the record therein and the briefs in the case of O’Connor v. Gertgens, 85 Minn. 481, 89 N. W. 866. The questions presented for our decision in these cases are substantially the same as those decided in the case cited. We therefore hold, following that case, that the judgment in each of these cases must be affirmed. Let final judgment therein be so entered but without statutory costs.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In each of the foregoing cases there was an appeal from the judgment of the district court of the county of Traverse, and each case was submitted to this court upon the record therein and the briefs in the case of O’Connor v. Gertgens, 85 Minn. 481, 89 N. W. 866. The questions presented for our decision in these cases are substantially the same as those decided in the case cited. We therefore hold, following that case, that the judgment in each of these cases must be affirmed. Let final judgment therein be so entered but without statutory costs.

Judgments affirmed.

O'Connor v. Doll, 93 N.W. 1134, 88 Minn. 455, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 430 (Mich. 1903).

Pincite

93 N.W. 1134 (O'Connor v. Doll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related