O'Connor v. Commissioner

Fifth Circuit

O'Connor v. Commissioner

110 F.2d 652, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 555, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4622

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 1940

DocketNo. 9405

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 110 F.2d 652 (O'Connor v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Connor v. Commissioner, 110 F.2d 652, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 555, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4622 (5th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. It involves a deficiency in income tax of the petitioner for the taxable year 1936.

During said year the petitioner, who was domiciled with his wife in the State of Texas, realized a capital gain from the sale of United States bonds acquired by him from his brother by bequest. The question is whether such gain was community income or constituted his separate income. The opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals is reported in 40 B.T.A. 488, which is referred to for a complete statement of the facts.

We have here a simple sale of separate property acquired by petitioner as legatee upon the death of his brother on October 20, 1932. The commissioner held that the gain from the proceeds of the sale constituted the petitioner’s separate income, and the board approved the commissioner’s determination. We concur in the conclusion of the board. Love v. Robertson, 7 Tex. 6, 56 Am.Dec. 41; Chappell v. McIntyre, 9 Tex. 161; Rose v. Houston, 11 Tex. 324, 62 Am.Dec. 478; Oliver v. Robertson, 41 Tex. 422; Hamilton v. Brooks, 51 Tex. 142; Edwards and Wife v. Brown, 68 Tex. 329, 4 S.W. 380; Schmidt v. Huppman, 73 Tex. 112, 11 S.W. 175; Stringfellow v. Sorrells, 82 Tex. 277, 18 S.W. 689; Welder v. Lambert, 91 Tex. 510, 44 S.W. 281; Arnold v. Leonard, 114 Tex. 535, 273 S.W. 799; Dakan v. Dakan, 125 Tex. 305, 83 S.W.2d 620; Gleich v. Bongio, 128 Tex. 606, 99 S.W.2d 881; Tison v. Gass, 46 Tex. Civ.App. 163, 102 S.W. 751; Givens v. Carter, Tex.Civ.App., 146 S.W. 623; Stephens v. Stephens, Tex.Civ.App., 292 S.W. 290; Oglesby v. Potts, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W.2d 815; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Simpson-Fell Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 325, affirmed, Tex., 125 S.W.2d 263; Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. v. Thorp, Tex.Civ.App., 86 S.W.2d 644; Fain v. Fain, Tex.Civ.App., 93 S.W.2d 1226; Estrada v. Reed, Tex.Civ.App., 98 S.W.2d 1042; Gillespie v. Gillespie, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 89.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. It involves a deficiency in income tax of the petitioner for the taxable year 1936.

During said year the petitioner, who was domiciled with his wife in the State of Texas, realized a capital gain from the sale of United States bonds acquired by him from his brother by bequest. The question is whether such gain was community income or constituted his separate income. The opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals is reported in 40 B.T.A. 488, which is referred to for a complete statement of the facts.

We have here a simple sale of separate property acquired by petitioner as legatee upon the death of his brother on October 20, 1932. The commissioner held that the gain from the proceeds of the sale constituted the petitioner’s separate income, and the board approved the commissioner’s determination. We concur in the conclusion of the board. Love v. Robertson, 7 Tex. 6, 56 Am.Dec. 41; Chappell v. McIntyre, 9 Tex. 161; Rose v. Houston, 11 Tex. 324, 62 Am.Dec. 478; Oliver v. Robertson, 41 Tex. 422; Hamilton v. Brooks, 51 Tex. 142; Edwards and Wife v. Brown, 68 Tex. 329, 4 S.W. 380; Schmidt v. Huppman, 73 Tex. 112, 11 S.W. 175; Stringfellow v. Sorrells, 82 Tex. 277, 18 S.W. 689; Welder v. Lambert, 91 Tex. 510, 44 S.W. 281; Arnold v. Leonard, 114 Tex. 535, 273 S.W. 799; Dakan v. Dakan, 125 Tex. 305, 83 S.W.2d 620; Gleich v. Bongio, 128 Tex. 606, 99 S.W.2d 881; Tison v. Gass, 46 Tex. Civ.App. 163, 102 S.W. 751; Givens v. Carter, Tex.Civ.App., 146 S.W. 623; Stephens v. Stephens, Tex.Civ.App., 292 S.W. 290; Oglesby v. Potts, Tex.Civ.App., 40 S.W.2d 815; Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Simpson-Fell Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 325, affirmed, Tex., 125 S.W.2d 263; Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. v. Thorp, Tex.Civ.App., 86 S.W.2d 644; Fain v. Fain, Tex.Civ.App., 93 S.W.2d 1226; Estrada v. Reed, Tex.Civ.App., 98 S.W.2d 1042; Gillespie v. Gillespie, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 89.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 F.2d 652, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 555, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-commissioner-ca5-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack