O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
987 A.2d 715, 605 Pa. 129, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2896
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did Cozen O’Connor have standing to obtain a declaratory judgment where Cozen O’Connor alleged in its complaint that it intended to forgive the outstanding debt of the Friends of Bob Brady Campaign Committee at one time and in toto, thereby exposing itself to potential civil penalties *130 and other sanctions under Phila. Code § 20-612 for violations of Phila. Code § 20-1002?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics, 987 A.2d 715, 605 Pa. 129, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2896 (Pa. 2009).
987 A.2d 715 (O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
105 A.3d 1217 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
71 A.3d 407 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)