O'Connor v. Board of Regents of State of Florida
This text of 523 So. 2d 728 (O'Connor v. Board of Regents of State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The O’Connors appeal a final order of summary judgment entered in favor of ap-pellees in a medical malpractice action. They contend the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment because there were material facts in dispute. We hold that the record supports the trial court’s determination that Dr. Stoner was not a “similar health care provider” as defined in section 768.45(2)(b) and that Dr. [729]*729Stoner did not qualify as an expert under section 768.45(2)(c)2.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
523 So. 2d 728, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1389, 1988 WL 31689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-board-of-regents-of-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-1988.