O'Connor v. Bellamy

Fourth Circuit

O'Connor v. Bellamy

572 F. App'x 254

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 28, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1183

StatusPublished

This text of 572 F. App'x 254 (O'Connor v. Bellamy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Connor v. Bellamy, 572 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[255]*255Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to file a complaint because she failed to comply with the pre-filing injunction imposed by that court in 2006. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Connor v. Virginia, No. 3:14-cv-00095-JRS (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[255]*255Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to file a complaint because she failed to comply with the pre-filing injunction imposed by that court in 2006. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Connor v. Virginia, No. 3:14-cv-00095-JRS (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 F. App'x 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnor-v-bellamy-ca4-2014.