O'Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2006·No. 06-1822·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1822

CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AAMCO/CINNAT, INCORPORATED; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00328-REP)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous her civil action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

O’Connor’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

See O’Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc., No. 3:06-cv-00328-REP (E.D. Va.

filed June 5, 2006 & entered June 6, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc., (4th Cir. 2006).

O'Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc. (O'Connor v. AAMCO/Cinnat, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.