O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation

200 S.W.3d 554, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 1, 2006·No. ED 86853·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation, 200 S.W.3d 554, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

200 S.W.3d 554 (O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)