O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation

200 S.W.3d 554, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 1, 2006

DocketED 86853

StatusPublished

This text of 200 S.W.3d 554 (O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Conner v. Service United States Corporation, 200 S.W.3d 554, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 554, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconner-v-service-united-states-corporation-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack