O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Company, Inc.

41 N.E.2d 177, 288 N.Y. 486, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1344
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 19, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 N.E.2d 177 (O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Company, Inc., 41 N.E.2d 177, 288 N.Y. 486, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1344 (N.Y. 1942).

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that questions of fact were presented for the determination of the jury in regard both to the defendant’s negligence, and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.
209 N.E.2d 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Campo v. Scofield
95 N.E.2d 802 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.E.2d 177, 288 N.Y. 486, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-v-westinghouse-x-ray-company-inc-ny-1942.