O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Co.
256 A.D. 847, 10 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D. 8 →
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference in a personal injury action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Co., 256 A.D. 847, 10 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
256 A.D. 847 (O'Connell v. Westinghouse X-Ray Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.