O'Connell v. Smith

76 N.W. 1116, 101 Wis. 68, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 290
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided November 1, 1898·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BaRdeen, J.

Since the amendment of sec. 8069, R. S. 1878, by ch. 212, Laws of 1895, an' order setting aside or refusing to set aside a petition for a lien is not appealable. [69] The case of Kunze v. Kunze, 95 Wis. 264, which holds that an appeal does not lie from an order setting aside a notice of Us penclens, is much in point. Prior to the amendment mentioned, orders requiring or refusing to require a complaint to be made more definite and certain were not ap-pealable unless discretion was abused. McCarville v. Boyle, 89 Wis. 651; Adamson v. Raymer, 94 Wis. 243. Since the amendment, such orders cannot be reviewed in this court except upon appeal from the final judgment.

By the Gourt.— The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connell v. Smith, 76 N.W. 1116, 101 Wis. 68, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 290 (Wis. 1898).

76 N.W. 1116 (O'Connell v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morford v. Pyle
215 N.W. 690 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
State ex rel. Schumacher v. Markham
155 N.W. 917 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
McElroy v. Minnesota Percheron Horse Co.
85 N.W. 119 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)