O'Connell v. Rabin
This text of 596 So. 2d 1299 (O'Connell v. Rabin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant, Thomas J. O’Connell, the president and major stockholder of a corporation, appeals the denial of a motion to intervene in litigation involving the corporation. We reverse.
Where a party, as here, has demonstrated sufficient equities or other special reasons to justify their participation in the proceedings, intervention should be permitted. Cole v. Glynn, 397 So.2d 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see also Wags Transportation System v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 751 (Fla.1956).
The facts of this case, at this posture, dictate that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s intervention. Concomitantly, we find that equity and the ends of justice require that appellant be permitted to intervene. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.
GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
596 So. 2d 1299, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5140, 1992 WL 91382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-v-rabin-fladistctapp-1992.