O'Connell v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Connell v. Hults

24 A.D.2d 899, 264 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 899 (O'Connell v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Connell v. Hults, 24 A.D.2d 899, 264 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles which suspended petitioner’s operator’s license for 60 days for violation of section 1154 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 4, 1965, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. Upon all the facts adduced at the hearing, we are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Referee that petitioner failed to exercise due care to avoid colliding with a pedestrian in Hartsdale, New York, on April 1, 1965. (See Matter of Deutsch v. Hults, 10 A D 2d 724.) Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles which suspended petitioner’s operator’s license for 60 days for violation of section 1154 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 4, 1965, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. Upon all the facts adduced at the hearing, we are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Referee that petitioner failed to exercise due care to avoid colliding with a pedestrian in Hartsdale, New York, on April 1, 1965. (See Matter of Deutsch v. Hults, 10 A D 2d 724.) Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 899, 264 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-v-hults-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack