O'Connell v. Bryant

126 Mass. 232, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 215
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 Mass. 232 (O'Connell v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connell v. Bryant, 126 Mass. 232, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 215 (Mass. 1879).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

By the well settled practice, two persons sued together in tort, who sever in their answers, although they appear by the same attorney, are to be treated as separate parties, and each of them, if he prevails, is entitled to separate costs, except for money paid out for expenses by the two jointly. Gen. Sts. c. 156, § 1. Mason v. Waite, 1 Pick. 452. Fales v. Stone, 9 Met. 316. George v. Reed, 104 Mass. 366. Upton v. Pratt, 106 Mass. 344. And the defendants, having prevailed upon this appeal, are entitled also to the costs thereof. Gen. Sts. o. 156, § 26. New Haven Northampton Co. v. Northampton, 102 Mass. 116, 126.

Taxation affirmed, with costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Stoddard
37 N.E.2d 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Bill v. Boynton
33 N.E. 399 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Mass. 232, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-v-bryant-mass-1879.