O'Connell-Babcock v. Myers

987 P.2d 462, 328 Or. 657, 1999 Ore. LEXIS 268
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 1999
DocketSC S46232; SC S46233
StatusPublished

This text of 987 P.2d 462 (O'Connell-Babcock v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Connell-Babcock v. Myers, 987 P.2d 462, 328 Or. 657, 1999 Ore. LEXIS 268 (Or. 1999).

Opinion

*660 PER CURIAM

This is a consolidated proceeding to review a ballot title. Petitioners are electors who timely submitted written comments on the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. Accordingly, they may petition this court seeking a different ballot title. ORS 250.085(2).

Petitioner Collis asserts that the caption, result statements, and summary in the certified ballot title are unsatisfactory. Petitioners O’Connell-Babcock, Troen, and Rowe challenge the result statements and summary. We have considered each of petitioners’ arguments and conclude that none of those arguments establishes that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title fails to comply substantially with the standards for a ballot title set out in ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d). A detailed discussion of our reasons for that conclusion would not serve the interest of the bar or the public. Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title:

AMENDS LAWS REGULATING LICENSING, CONTROL, IMPOUNDMENT AND KILLING OF DOGS
RESULT OF “YES” VOTE: “Yes” vote repeals current laws regulating dogs; restricts circumstances when dogs may be impounded/killed.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote retains current laws regulating dogs and establishing when dogs may be impounded/killed.
SUMMARY: Measure repeals current state laws regulating dogs; establishes minimum standards for ordinances, regulations governing when dogs may be impounded for more than ten days or killed. Requires determination that owner/keeper will not properly care for dog or will again allow dog to become a public nuisance before such impoundment or killing of dog permitted. Establishes notification, mediation and appeal procedures for enforcement actions. Allocates portion of penalties paid by dog owners/keepers to programs to reduce animal abandonment/increase animal adoption rates. Other changes.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(10).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 250.085
Oregon § 250.085
§ 250.035
Oregon § 250.035

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
987 P.2d 462, 328 Or. 657, 1999 Ore. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-babcock-v-myers-or-1999.