Ocltree v. Phillips

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 7, 2005
• Docket: 04-7719
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7719

TIMOTHY OCLTREE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES PHILLIPS; PATRICIA BAILEY; DAVID HINES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-306-5-H)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Ocltree, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Mitchell, Kelly L. Podger, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina; Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Ocltree appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Ocltree v. Phillips, No. CA-03-306-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -