Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.

45 A.2d 47, 353 Pa. 308, 1946 Pa. LEXIS 235

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 9, 1946·No. Appeal, 193·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises no substantial question that was not disposed of on the prior appeal: Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, 349 Pa. 527, 37 A. 2d 538. The settled rule is that summary judgment on pleadings may not be entered unless the right is clear. As the court below pointed out in its opinion, issues of fact are raised in this case which should be determined by trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises no substantial question that was not disposed of on the prior appeal: Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, 349 Pa. 527, 37 A. 2d 538. The settled rule is that summary judgment on pleadings may not be entered unless the right is clear. As the court below pointed out in its opinion, issues of fact are raised in this case which should be determined by trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc., 45 A.2d 47, 353 Pa. 308, 1946 Pa. LEXIS 235 (Pa. 1946).

Pincite

45 A.2d 47 (Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related