Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.

45 A.2d 47, 353 Pa. 308, 1946 Pa. LEXIS 235

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 9, 1946

DocketAppeal, 193

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 A.2d 47 (Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc., 45 A.2d 47, 353 Pa. 308, 1946 Pa. LEXIS 235 (Pa. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises no substantial question that was not disposed of on the prior appeal: Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, 349 Pa. 527, 37 A. 2d 538. The settled rule is that summary judgment on pleadings may not be entered unless the right is clear. As the court below pointed out in its opinion, issues of fact are raised in this case which should be determined by trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises no substantial question that was not disposed of on the prior appeal: Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, 349 Pa. 527, 37 A. 2d 538. The settled rule is that summary judgment on pleadings may not be entered unless the right is clear. As the court below pointed out in its opinion, issues of fact are raised in this case which should be determined by trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.2d 47, 353 Pa. 308, 1946 Pa. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ockman-v-jones-machine-tool-works-inc-pa-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack