Ockerman v. Wise

Sixth Circuit

Ockerman v. Wise

202 F.2d 144

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1953

Docket11664_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 202 F.2d 144 (Ockerman v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ockerman v. Wise, 202 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties ;

And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the ap-pellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no-diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm’r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U. S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms, D.C.E.D.S.C., 97 F.Supp. 312;

The judgment of the district court, sustaining appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard and considered on the record, on the briefs of the contending parties, and on the oral arguments of attorneys representing the parties ;

And it appearing, without dispute, that the appellant administrator and the ap-pellee (defendant) are citizens and residents of the State of Kentucky and were such at the time of the institution of this action and that, therefore, there was no-diversity of citizenship to vest jurisdiction in the district court, see Mecom, Adm’r, v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Company, 284 U. S. 183, 52 S.Ct. 84, 76 L.Ed. 233; and Mason v. Helms, D.C.E.D.S.C., 97 F.Supp. 312;

The judgment of the district court, sustaining appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 F.2d 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ockerman-v-wise-ca6-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack