Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Taylor

Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Taylor

96 S.E. 396, 22 Ga. App. 570, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 606
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 1, 1918
Docket9186
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 396 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Taylor, 96 S.E. 396, 22 Ga. App. 570, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition as amended.

Judgment affirmed.

Harwell, J., concurs; Broyles, P. J., dissents. Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error. Wallis & Fort, McDonald & Bennett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 396, 22 Ga. App. 570, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-taylor-gactapp-1918.