Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Prickett

Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Prickett

111 S.E. 81, 28 Ga. App. 383, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 533
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 9, 1922
Docket12668
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 81 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Prickett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Prickett, 111 S.E. 81, 28 Ga. App. 383, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the evidence submitted, this court does not feel authorized to set aside the verdict and judgment on the general grounds of the motion for a new trial. See Whitcomb v. Payne, 27 Ga. App. 722 (109 S. E. 703). The portion of the charge complained of is in all [384]*384respects substantially the same as that approved by this court in Ocilla Southern R. Co. v. McInvale, 26 Ga. App. 106 (105 S. E. 451), and the exceptions taken to the charge in this case are controlled by the rulings made in that case.

Decided March 9, 1922. Action for damages; from Ben Hill superior court — Judge Gower. May 17, 1921. Wall & Grantham, Quincey & Rice, for plaintiff in error. Eldridge Cutts, A. J. & J. C. McDonald, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ocilla Southern Railroad v. McInvale
105 S.E. 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Whitcomb v. Payne
109 S.E. 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 81, 28 Ga. App. 383, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-prickett-gactapp-1922.