Ocilla Southern Railroad v. McAllister

93 S.E. 26, 20 Ga. App. 400, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 913
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 27, 1917
Docket8540
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 26 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. McAllister, 93 S.E. 26, 20 Ga. App. 400, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. The plaintiff’s petition was headed, “State of Georgia, County of Wilcox,” and was filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court of that county, but was not addressed to the superior court or any court. It prayed for process requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of “this court.” Attached to it was a process with the caption, “State of Georgia, Wilcox County,” bearing teste in the name of the judge of the superior court of Wilcox county and signed by the clerk of that court, requiring the defendant to be and appear “at the next superior court to be held in and for said county on the third Monday in June next.” The petition was amendable by addressing it. to the superior court of Wilcox county, and the trial court properly allowed such amendment. Parish v. Davis, 126 Ga. 840 (55 S. E. 1032); Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Pritchard, 123 Ga. 320 (51 S. E. 424); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Cook, 6 Ga. App. 128 (64 S. E. 665); Nance v. Patterson, 10 Ga. App. 843 (74 S. E. 438); Kelly v. Fudge, 2 Ga. App. 759 (59 S. E. 19.); Civil Code, §§ 5682, 5691.

2. Special defects or omissions in the plaintiff’s petition may always be taken advantage of by demurrer; and unless cured by amendment, the petition should be dismissed. Park’s Ann. Code, § 5631. All necessary jurisdictional facts must be clearly and distinctly set out in the petition, and their absence may be taken advantage of by demurrer. White v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic R. Co., 5 Ga. App. 308 (63 S. E. 234); Flint River & Northeastern R. Co. v. Sanders, 18 Ga. App. 766 (90 S. E. 655). In the present case it does not appear from the petition that the alleged injuries were inflicted in the county in which the suit was brought. A suit against a railroad company for personal injuries, which does not allege that they were inflicted in the county of the suit, fails to show that the court to which the petition is addressed has jurisdiction to try the case. Section 2798 of the Civil Code of 1910 provides that the company “shall be sued in the county in which the cause of action originated; . . and any judgment rendered in any other county than the one in which the cause so originated shall be utterly void.” “A suit brought elsewhere than is there provided is void.” Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Dowe, [402]*4026 Ga. App. 858 (65 S. E. 1100). See also Southern Ry. Co. v. Summers, 118 Ga. 175 (45 S. E. 27). The general demurrer in this ease, therefore, should have been sustained. Flint River & Northeastern R. Co. v. Sanders, supra, and cases there cited.

3. The omission to state in the petition all facts necessary to give the court jurisdiction of the case is amendable. Park’s Ann. Code, § 5691. In view of the ruling stated above, the judgment of the trial court, overruling the demurrer to the petition, is reversed, but with leave for the plaintiff so to amend the petition, by the time the remittitur from this court is made the judgment of the court below, that it shall appear therefrom that the injuries sued for were inflicted in Wilcox county.

Judgment reversed, with direction.

George and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
141 S.E.2d 783 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Dutton v. Freeman
99 S.E.2d 204 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Stone v. COLONIAL CREDIT COMPANY
91 S.E.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Butler v. Winton
192 S.E. 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Sloan v. Smith
116 S.E. 200 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Payne v. Chambliss
108 S.E. 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Burton v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.
103 S.E. 881 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Gamble v. Shingler
96 S.E. 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 26, 20 Ga. App. 400, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-mcallister-gactapp-1917.