Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Fletcher

85 S.E. 673, 16 Ga. App. 522, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 108
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 28, 1915
Docket6003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.E. 673 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Fletcher, 85 S.E. 673, 16 Ga. App. 522, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 108 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that the place at which the defendant’s train struck and killed the plaintiff’s mule was in the. county in which the suit was brought. • On the point that the question as to proof, of venue, raised in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, was waived by failure to raise it in the court below, see Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dowie, 6 Ga. App. 858 (65 S. E. 1091), and Summers v. Southern Railway Co., 118 Ga. 175 (45 S. E. 27).

2. There was some evidence to support the finding of tlie. jury, - and, .the [523]*523trial judge having approved it, his discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be controlled. Judgment affirmed.

Decided June 28, 1915. Action for damages; from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Griffin. August 28, 1914. H. J. Quincey, J. B. Wall, Elkins & Koplin, for plaintiff in error. McDonald & Grantham, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ueal v. AAA Partners in Adoption, Inc.
603 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 673, 16 Ga. App. 522, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-fletcher-gactapp-1915.