Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Fletcher
This text of 85 S.E. 673 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that the place at which the defendant’s train struck and killed the plaintiff’s mule was in the. county in which the suit was brought. • On the point that the question as to proof, of venue, raised in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, was waived by failure to raise it in the court below, see Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dowie, 6 Ga. App. 858 (65 S. E. 1091), and Summers v. Southern Railway Co., 118 Ga. 175 (45 S. E. 27).
2. There was some evidence to support the finding of tlie. jury, - and, .the [523]*523trial judge having approved it, his discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be controlled. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 673, 16 Ga. App. 522, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-fletcher-gactapp-1915.