Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Chatham Bank & Trust Co.

115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 796, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 396
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 20, 1923
DocketNo. 3276
StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 646 (Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Chatham Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Chatham Bank & Trust Co., 115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 796, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 396 (Ga. 1923).

Opinion

Hines, J.

The rulings complained of in the present bill of exceptions are ‘ controlled by the decision in this case, when the same was before this court on a former occasion (Chatham Bank & Trust Co. v. Ocilla South[797]*797ern R. Co., 153 Ga. 37, 111 S. E. 570); and the court did not err in appointing a receiver, and in ordering the former receiver to turn over to him the property of this company.

No. 3276. January 20, 1923. TP. F. George, Wall & Grantham, and Quincey & Bice, for plaintiffs in error. Lawton & Cunningham and FP. E. Kay, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chatham Bank & Trust Co. v. Ocilla Southern Railroad
111 S.E. 570 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 796, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocilla-southern-railroad-v-chatham-bank-trust-co-ga-1923.