Ocilla Southern Railroad v. Chatham Bank & Trust Co.

115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 796, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 396

Opinion

Hines, J.

The rulings complained of in the present bill of exceptions are ‘ controlled by the decision in this case, when the same was before this court on a former occasion (Chatham Bank & Trust Co. v. Ocilla South ern R. Co., 153 Ga. 37, 111 S. E. 570); and the court did not err in appointing a receiver, and in ordering the former receiver to turn over to him the property of this company.

No. 3276. January 20, 1923. TP. F. George, Wall & Grantham, and Quincey & Bice, for plaintiffs in error. Lawton & Cunningham and FP. E. Kay, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.