Ochs v. Ochs

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ochs v. Ochs

192 A. 502, 122 N.J. Eq. 143, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 581

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 192 A. 502 (Ochs v. Ochs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ochs v. Ochs, 192 A. 502, 122 N.J. Eq. 143, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 581 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Ctjkiam.

The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause were correct in law and fact. The issues raised were properly determined and the decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Ctjkiam.

The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause were correct in law and fact. The issues raised were properly determined and the decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 502, 122 N.J. Eq. 143, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ochs-v-ochs-nj-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack