Ochs v. Ochs
192 A. 502, 122 N.J. Eq. 143, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 581
Opinion
The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor who heard the cause were correct in law and fact. The issues raised were properly determined and the decree will be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Cole, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ochs v. Ochs, 192 A. 502, 122 N.J. Eq. 143, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 581 (N.J. 1937).
192 A. 502 (Ochs v. Ochs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Hackensack Trust Co. v. Ackerman
47 A.2d 832 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Lombardi v. Camden Trust Co.
39 A.2d 229 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)