Ochs v. Ford Motor Co.

300 A.D.2d 89, 750 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12165

This text of 300 A.D.2d 89 (Ochs v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ochs v. Ford Motor Co., 300 A.D.2d 89, 750 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered October 11, 2001, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied since the parties’ conflicting evidentiary submissions raise a material question of fact as to whether plaintiff was exposed to asbestos while working on defendant’s products (see Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp., 212 AD2d 462; cf. Comeau v W.R. Grace & Co., 216 AD2d 79). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reid v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
212 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Comeau v. W.R. Grace & Co.
216 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 89, 750 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ochs-v-ford-motor-co-nyappdiv-2002.