Ochoa v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Ochoa v. United States

237 F. 1019, 150 C.C.A. 668, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1624

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 1917

DocketNo. 2891

StatusPublished

This text of 237 F. 1019 (Ochoa v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ochoa v. United States, 237 F. 1019, 150 C.C.A. 668, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1624 (5th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On examination of the record, in the light of brief of plaintiffs in error, we find that none of the assignments of error are well taken. There was ample proof of the conspiracy charged in the indictment and also to prove the overt act. The evidence of the alleged accomplice, Mendenhall, was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence in the case. The alleged misconduct of one of the jurors, in the case'pending the trial is not sufficiently established by the evidence. Finding no reversible error assigned or patent of record, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On examination of the record, in the light of brief of plaintiffs in error, we find that none of the assignments of error are well taken. There was ample proof of the conspiracy charged in the indictment and also to prove the overt act. The evidence of the alleged accomplice, Mendenhall, was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence in the case. The alleged misconduct of one of the jurors, in the case'pending the trial is not sufficiently established by the evidence. Finding no reversible error assigned or patent of record, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 F. 1019, 150 C.C.A. 668, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ochoa-v-united-states-ca5-1917.