Ochoa v. Stephens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ochoa v. Stephens

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 2025

Docket1D2025-1786

StatusPublished

This text of Ochoa v. Stephens (Ochoa v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ochoa v. Stephens, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1786 _____________________________

BERNARDO OCHOA,

Petitioner,

v.

CAPTAIN STEPHENS,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

December 31, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

LEWIS, LONG, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Bernardo Ochoa, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI