Ochoa v. Stephens
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-1786
BERNARDO OCHOA, Petitioner, v.
CAPTAIN STEPHENS,
Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
December 31, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
LEWIS, LONG, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Bernardo Ochoa, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ochoa v. Stephens (Ochoa v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.