Ochoa v. Amachree

592 N.E.2d 793, 79 N.Y.2d 941, 583 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1019
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 592 N.E.2d 793 (Ochoa v. Amachree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ochoa v. Amachree, 592 N.E.2d 793, 79 N.Y.2d 941, 583 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1019 (N.Y. 1992).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying defendant’s motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 N.E.2d 793, 79 N.Y.2d 941, 583 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ochoa-v-amachree-ny-1992.