Ochacher v. Jamaica Bay Riding Academy

202 A.D.2d 239, 608 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Kings County (Joseph Dowd, J.), entered September 19, 1991 upon a verdict in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiffs complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained when she fell off one of defendant’s horses. Upon review of the evidence, we conclude that the jury could have reasonably found that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of demonstrating defendant knew or should have known of the animal’s vicious propensities or that the horse was unsuitable (Beers v Elebash, 186 AD2d 515, lv denied 81 NY2d 706).

We have reviewed plaintiffs claims concerning the court’s jury instructions concerning liability and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ochacher v. Jamaica Bay Riding Academy, 202 A.D.2d 239, 608 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 239 (Ochacher v. Jamaica Bay Riding Academy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairman v. Santos
174 Misc. 2d 85 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Vavosa v. Stiles
220 A.D.2d 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)