Oceano Shipping Co. v. United States

18 Cust. Ct. 389, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 500
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 1947
DocketNo. 6878; Entry No. 861768, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cust. Ct. 389 (Oceano Shipping Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oceano Shipping Co. v. United States, 18 Cust. Ct. 389, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 500 (cusc 1947).

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve the question of the value of certain drums filled with olive oil or other commodities imported from various countries.

From the uncontradicted evidence it appears that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that involved in C. H. Powell Co., Inc. (Douredoure Bros.) v. United States, 28 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 310, C. A. D. 160, and the record in that case has been incorporated herein. The court there held that — ■

* * * the presumed correctness of the value — 300 Drachmas each — found by the appraiser to be the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums has not been overcome by the evidence of record.

That observation is equally applicable to the drums involved in these appeals.

Inasmuch as there is no export value higher than the above-mentioned foreign value, I follow the cited authority and find that “the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums” in each of these appeals is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cust. Ct. 389, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oceano-shipping-co-v-united-states-cusc-1947.