Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins
188 F. 909, 110 C.C.A. 543, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373
Opinion
Judgment affirmed.
On Motion for Reargument.
PER CURIAM. The motion for reargument is denied. Inasmuch as the mandate has gone to 'the Circuit Court, application for a stay to allow plaintiff in error to apply for certiorari should be made there.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins, 188 F. 909, 110 C.C.A. 543, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373 (2d Cir. 1911).
188 F. 909 (Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE mbH v. Novamont Corp.
578 F. Supp. 78 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Kozman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
145 F. Supp. 140 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Filardo v. Foley Bros.
191 Misc. 671 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Yabucoa Sugar Co. v. Domenech
53 P.R. 837 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1938)