Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins

188 F. 909, 110 C.C.A. 543, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 188 F. 909 (Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Watkins, 188 F. 909, 110 C.C.A. 543, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373 (2d Cir. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

On Motion for Reargument.

PER CURIAM. The motion for reargument is denied. Inasmuch as the mandate has gone to 'the Circuit Court, application for a stay to allow plaintiff in error to apply for certiorari should be made there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE mbH v. Novamont Corp.
578 F. Supp. 78 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Kozman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
145 F. Supp. 140 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Filardo v. Foley Bros.
191 Misc. 671 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Yabucoa Sugar Co. v. Domenech
53 P.R. 837 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F. 909, 110 C.C.A. 543, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oceanic-steam-navigation-co-v-watkins-ca2-1911.