Oceanic Service Corp. v. Isbrandtsen Co.

281 A.D. 1027, 122 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202

This text of 281 A.D. 1027 (Oceanic Service Corp. v. Isbrandtsen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oceanic Service Corp. v. Isbrandtsen Co., 281 A.D. 1027, 122 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified so as to provide for the limitation of the demand to item 1, up to and including item 1 (g). We think that the particulars thus allowed should be sufficient. Items 1 (h) to 1 (w) are eliminated. As so modified the order is affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 1027, 122 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oceanic-service-corp-v-isbrandtsen-co-nyappdiv-1953.