Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker
This text of Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker (Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) OCEANA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0555 (PLF) ) WILBUR ROSS, ) United States Secretary of Commerce, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff Oceana’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 19] is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the federal defendants’ motion for summary
judgment [Dkt. No. 22] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED WITHOUT VACATUR
to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) for the limited purposes outlined in the
accompanying opinion; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer in order to propose
a schedule by which the NMFS will address the deficiencies identified in the accompanying
opinion. On or before November 6, 2020, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the Court whether they have reached agreement on a proposed schedule. If the parties are not in
agreement, they shall inform the Court of their respective positions.
SO ORDERED.
_/s/____________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: October 9, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oceana-inc-v-pritzker-dcd-2020.