Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) OCEANA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0555 (PLF) ) WILBUR ROSS, ) United States Secretary of Commerce, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff Oceana’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 19] is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the federal defendants’ motion for summary
judgment [Dkt. No. 22] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED WITHOUT VACATUR
to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) for the limited purposes outlined in the
accompanying opinion; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer in order to propose
a schedule by which the NMFS will address the deficiencies identified in the accompanying
opinion. On or before November 6, 2020, the parties shall file a joint status report informing the Court whether they have reached agreement on a proposed schedule. If the parties are not in
agreement, they shall inform the Court of their respective positions.
SO ORDERED.
_/s/____________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: October 9, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker (Oceana, Inc. v. Pritzker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.