Ocean Parkway Medical Building v. Bakalis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ocean Parkway Medical Building v. Bakalis

120 A.D.2d 658, 502 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56756

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 658 (Ocean Parkway Medical Building v. Bakalis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocean Parkway Medical Building v. Bakalis, 120 A.D.2d 658, 502 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for libel, slander, and tortious interference with a contract, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 5, 1985, as denied their motion to amend their answer to plead the defense of the Statute of Limitations.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted.

On the facts presented, including the lack of demonstrable prejudice to the plaintiff, Special Term should have granted the defendants’ motion to amend their answer (see, CPLR 3025 [b]). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for libel, slander, and tortious interference with a contract, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 5, 1985, as denied their motion to amend their answer to plead the defense of the Statute of Limitations.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted.

On the facts presented, including the lack of demonstrable prejudice to the plaintiff, Special Term should have granted the defendants’ motion to amend their answer (see, CPLR 3025 [b]). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 658, 502 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocean-parkway-medical-building-v-bakalis-nyappdiv-1986.