Ocean Key House, Corp. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ocean Key House, Corp. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority

545 So. 2d 413, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1444, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291, 1989 WL 62749

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 1989

DocketNo. 88-3002

StatusPublished

This text of 545 So. 2d 413 (Ocean Key House, Corp. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocean Key House, Corp. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 545 So. 2d 413, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1444, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291, 1989 WL 62749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenged appellee’s interpretation of its Customer Service Policies, pursuant to which additional fees were assessed against appellant.¹ After an eviden-tiary hearing the trial court ruled in favor of appellee, and we affirm. Having con-[414]*414eluded that an ambiguity existed in the Customer Service Policies, the trial court considered the extrinsic evidence offered at the evidentiary hearing and resolved the ambiguity in favor of appellee, whose interpretation more closely comports with the purposes of an impact fee than does the interpretation advanced by appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenged appellee’s interpretation of its Customer Service Policies, pursuant to which additional fees were assessed against appellant.¹ After an eviden-tiary hearing the trial court ruled in favor of appellee, and we affirm. Having con-[414]*414eluded that an ambiguity existed in the Customer Service Policies, the trial court considered the extrinsic evidence offered at the evidentiary hearing and resolved the ambiguity in favor of appellee, whose interpretation more closely comports with the purposes of an impact fee than does the interpretation advanced by appellant.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

545 So. 2d 413, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1444, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291, 1989 WL 62749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocean-key-house-corp-v-florida-keys-aqueduct-authority-fladistctapp-1989.