Ocean Frontage Co. v. McFadden

123 So. 668, 98 Fla. 202, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ocean Frontage Co. v. McFadden. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Fla. 197
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 19, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered and decreed by the Court that the said .decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed, upon authority of Ocean Frontage Company, et al., v. McFadden (Case No. 1), decided this term.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ocean Frontage Co. v. McFadden, 123 So. 668, 98 Fla. 202, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1162 (Fla. 1929).

123 So. 668 (Ocean Frontage Co. v. McFadden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.